Rack and Pinion Telescope Focuser Fix for Too Much Rock

Do you have back and forth rock in your rack and pinion focuser? I did and I fixed it with about $15 worth of parts. The illustrated story, below. At the bottom I have a parts list and step-by-step instructions if you want to do this on your own.

My Celestron C6-NGT is not a big light bucket but it is reasonably portable and that means I can plant my eyeball on her at a moment’s notice. I don’t need to invest a whole evening to enjoy a cup or two of coffee while gazing; I just drag the gear out to the back patio and viola, I’m entertained! The simple design of this Newtonian with a rack and pinion focuser makes the gear accessible, unintimidating and a big hit at parties. At our annual Christmas blowout in 2011 we had a line of people 10 deep for 4 hours waiting to check out Jupiter. For some, this was their first time looking through a “real” telescope.

While my scope gets a lot of use, Celestron did not count on me abusing this equipment when they designed the focuser. After about 10 sessions connecting a digital camera to my scope I began to notice rocker in the focuser draw tube. I must admit that I hung the afocal adapter off my Baader-Hyperion glass hand grenades, wrecking this focuser pretty good, as you will see below. I could calm the movement somewhat by clamping down on the focuser lock but that created more problems. First, it only stopped the movement in the N/S direction. E/W was still full of play unless I really tightened the lock like an animal. Second, this worsening condition effectively meant I could not collimate the scope. There was enough play in the assembly that the centerline of the draw tube moved each and every time I turned the knob. When fully extended the eyepiece was wiggling at the top almost an eighth of an inch from side to side! After 3 nights of blurry vision I decided to fix the focuser myself. Let me take you through the process. If your rack and pinion focuser is anything like mine you should be able to breathe new life into your eye for the sky.

Figure 1: The Culprit, two screws removed
Continue reading

Posted in Recreation, Science, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Go BIG or Go Home!

Go Big or Go Home, seems trite, but it is applicable to IT transformation. Companies that are successfully adopting cloud technologies are taking a transformation approach, not a technical project approach. The larger the scale of the program the more traction they are getting across the enterprise, business and IT. For too long virtualization has been conflated with consolidation and that’s been one of the sticking points when it comes to trying to get the business and application owners to buy in to change. Continue reading

Posted in Future of IT | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why I Read News, NOT Tech “News”

I read The Economist, Financial Times (when I can find it) and maybe the local paper in the city I find myself each week.  Online, I follow about 3 blogs and Fark.  I don’t, as a rule, read any of the 1200 technology magazines or blogs.  This sounds odd, coming from a guy who lives and breathes IT.  I am asked about this frequently, particularly by curious consultants who delight in being the first to tell me about some new development or breakthrough announced in the last hour.  “For goodness’ sake, man…don’t you have a feed for this sort of thing?”

No.

“But- why?”

Continue reading

Posted in Future of IT, Hardware, In the News/Blogosphere, Science, The Nature of IT | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s all about the content or “What’s in the Case?”

Steve Herrod’s super session was one of the things I enjoyed most about this year’s VMworld. Not only were the technologies and ideas that were introduced inspiring and where I was hoping to see VMware head but there was real passion for making content accessible evident throughout the entire presentation. VMworld coming so soon after the great one day class from Edward Tufte really increased the impact of the message. I had been thinking of content in terms of Big Information, of how do we present information to people, how do we share and collaborate etc. Steve’s presentation pushed that point even further, it’s all about the content really, the receptacle that it’s delivered in is irrelevant, it could be a briefcase, or a Ming vase, all the end user cares about is what’s in it. Just take a gander at Vincent Vega there staring at Marsellus Wallace’s soul, the briefcase isn’t what was cool in Pulp Fiction, it’s what was in it. Continue reading

Posted in Future of IT | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Solved problems

I took time out a few weeks back to attend Edward Tufte’s One-Day Course on “Presenting Data and Information” and learned several new things and had several ideas reinforced by the methods and examples that Edward used.  One of my favorite things that Edward brought up was encapsulated in this quote: “These are largely solved problems (displaying information); don’t get an original, get it right”.  This of course immediately brought to mind the dreaded “Not Invented Here” syndrome and led me to think about how often I’ve encountered this in the IT world.  On the other hand, innovation is terribly important and we take it very seriously at EMC - so how do you find the right balance of “solved problems” and innovation? Continue reading

Posted in The Nature of IT | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Knapp Shoes – RIP Old Friend

Dear Knapp,

I tried.  I gave it my best Pete's Last Pair of 2359sto keep the relationship alive.

Look…my grandfathers wore your shoes to the factory floor and the avionics shops before, during and after WWII.  My uncles wore their Knapps to school, then to the engineering lab, then to work.  My first pairs of Knapp style 2359 Plain-Toe Rocker Bottom Oxford saw me get married, built Legoland California and ushered in the birth of my children.  We have history, you and I.  I won’t forget that. Continue reading

Posted in Recreation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What is Virtualization?

It's all about mobilityI’ve been interviewing several people to lead up the Virtualization group of my organization lately and one of the candidates asked me an excellent question, “Well, what do you mean by Virtualization?”.  Very good question, am I talking about VMware, the hypervisor, virtualized infrastructure, what?  Apparently I’m in a heretical mood these days because my answer was, “No, I don’t mean any of that, I don’t want to limit it to that.  When I talk about Virtualization and what I want this team to focus on is bigger than that. Virtualization to me is technology enablement allowing IT to run the workloads you need to where you want to.” Continue reading

Posted in Future of IT | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What, you wanted me to report the NEWS?

I rarely catch CNN any more.  I clearly need to start watching Don Lemon.

Don Lemon via Jon Stewart

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Spam Cache Hides? Say it ain’t so!

Trolling the forums I came across this gem of a topic:

LuckyPlan asks…
Where we live, there is a cacher who ownes about 2 1/2 thousand caches under his account. Many/most are of very poor quality and of course, unmaintained. He really is taking up so much space he dominates and frankly, isn’t allowing for others to place good quality caches in many areas. It has got very frustrating sometimes.
He’s a good guy and everything, but I don’t know what utility he is getting out of all the caches he owns.

I was wondering, are other areas having this problem? Does anybody think GC.com will limit or should limit this type of behavior to encourage better quality caches?

Differentiate this thread from the “ban all micros” threads that pop up way too often in discussion.  In this case, the issue is spam caches and gaming the system to circumvent the guidelines/rules.  I know this cache hider.  He plays the game with people of the same mindset, just like everyone else plays with people of their particular philosophical bent.  Clearly, there are others who enjoy this style. Continue reading

Posted in Forums, Geocaching, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cloud Heresy

I’m about to commit a bit of cloud heresy as a technology guy writing about cloud and claiming that it’s really not all about hypervisors, automation and orchestration.  Sure, you need a measure of these components in order to be able to deliver on the cloud vision and model efficiently, but does that really solve the problems that are driving the consumers of IT to try and skirt enterprise IT and give their dollars to the public cloud?  I think the number of services being consumed that are called cloud but really aren’t and the amount of cloud washing going on in the marketplace clue us in on the fact that it’s not the technology per se that is driving the consumption of cloud.  The key thing I am hearing from my customers, and more importantly their customers, is that what is driving people to consume these services, some of which are actually inferior from a service management stand point to what is already offered internally, is the ease of consumption.  Consumers are voting with their dollars for quick provisioning, knowing what they’ll pay and the levers that effect that cost, and transparency around what they are getting and using. Continue reading

Posted in Private Cloud | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment